As Americans, we’re often taught that trusts and monopolies are the product of big business and are bad. However, if trusts and monopolies are bad when Big Business engages in monopolistic ways, why isn’t it bad when Big Labor engages in the same sort of behaviors that are condemned when committed by Big Business?
For over a week now, the nation has watched tens of thousands march in protest to Wisconsin Governor Scott Walker’s budget plan. Democrat lawmakers (aka Fleebaggers) have fled the state in order to avoid doing their duty, while Obama’s OFA has bussed in the astroturf from out of state. While the union meme has been that Walker’s plan is “union-busting,” perhaps a more apt description would be “trust-busting.”
One of the most vocal opponents of Scott Walker’s budget plan has been the Wisconsin Education Association Council [WEAC]. As a union affiliated with the NEA, WEAC (according to its website) represents 98,000 “educators” in the State of Wisconsin.
Like any union, WEAC has a vested interest in maintaining the status quo when it comes to forced dues from Wisconsin school teachers, as well as automatic dues deduction from teachers’ paychecks—both of which would be eliminated under Walker’s proposal.
Employers will be prohibited from collecting union dues and members of collective bargaining units will not be required to pay dues.
In essence, Walker’s proposal threatens the life blood of the WEAC which, according to its most recent financial report on file (FY 2009), raked in over $25 million from teachers in a one year period.
Another threat to WEAC, which no one in the mainstream media is talking about is the threat to the union’s insurance trust, called WEA Trust. The WEA Trust is, in essence, a union-run “multi-employer” health insurance trust (the employers, in this case, are school districts).
The way it works is that WEAC has, through collective bargaining (negotiations), convinced school districts to pay into the WEA Trust and, in turn, the WEA Trust is responsible for administering teachers’ benefits. According to PublicSchoolSpending.com, Walker’s proposal would give school boards the ability to shop freely for more competitive insurance rates and save the state millions.
Last year, the Education Action Group issued a report which stated, among other things, that:
WEA Trust, an insurance company established and closely associated with the Wisconsin Education Association Council (WEAC), siphons millions of crucial dollars from K-12 schools and their students every year.
WEA Trust has grown very fat on public school dollars, with a net worth of $316 million and a team of 12 administrators all receiving compensation packages worth six figures per year.
Sadly, this insurance swindle is endorsed by state law.
The group’s Communications Director, Steve Gunn, explains:
The pressure derives from state law, which makes the identity of a school’s health insurance carrier a topic of collective bargaining between local unions and school boards. That allows union representatives to come to the table demanding expensive WEA Trust coverage, and frequently school boards give in.
[snip]
Once school districts sign up for WEA Trust coverage, and write the carrier into collective bargaining agreements, the shackles are on. And they aren’t easily removed.
Local unions often refuse to have the provision stricken from school labor contracts in subsequent negotiations. If a school board presses the issue in an effort to save money, WEAC will frequently take the case to arbitration.
The Trust’s business practices also complicate the problem.
Districts need employee claim histories to provide to potential bidders, but WEA Trust sometimes refuses to surrender the information, making it more difficult, if not impossible, for competitors to draft an accurate insurance estimate.
WEA Trust also reportedly threatens districts with higher premiums – by removing them from regional insurance pools with lower rates – if they consider a cheaper carrier.
Some districts have managed to break WEA Trust’s shackles and the savings tell the story. Officials from 15 districts recently told EAG that they saved six figures the first year under new coverage, while still providing quality health benefits for employees. They also say the cost of their new coverage has remained steady in subsequent years.
But there is a catch. Officials at all of the breakaway districts said they had to surrender, or at least share, the insurance savings with their local unions, generally in the form of salary increases. That left them with little or no extra revenue to cover other costs.
In other words, WEAC, the union that has been most vocal during the last week’s protests has a vested interest in maintaining the status quo. If the union can defeat Scott Walker’s reform plans, not only does it keep the union dues of teachers, it also gets to keep its health insurance monopoly intact.
Of course, you’re not hearing this in the press as it doesn’t fit the convenient narrative of class warfare. So, the next time you have someone tell you how “mean” Scott Walker is for attacking the teachers’ union, you can simply reply: Follow the money.
_________________
“I bring reason to your ears, and, in language as plain as ABC, hold up truth to your eyes.” Thomas Paine, December 23, 1776
[Photo credit: Vaxomatic]
X-posted.
As Americans, we’re often taught that trusts and monopolies are the product of big business and are bad. However, if trusts and monopolies are bad when Big Business engages in monopolistic ways, why isn’t it bad when Big Labor engages in the same sort of behaviors that are condemned when committed by Big Business?
For over a week now, the nation has watched tens of thousands march in protest to Wisconsin Governor Scott Walker’s budget plan. Democrat lawmakers (aka Fleebaggers) have fled the state in order to avoid doing their duty, while Obama’s OFA has bussed in the astroturf from out of state. While the union meme has been that Walker’s plan is “union-busting,” perhaps a more apt description would be “trust-busting.”
One of the most vocal opponents of Scott Walker’s budget plan has been the Wisconsin Education Association Council [WEAC]. As a union affiliated with the NEA, WEAC (according to its website) represents 98,000 “educators” in the State of Wisconsin.
Like any union, WEAC has a vested interest in maintaining the status quo when it comes to forced dues from Wisconsin school teachers, as well as automatic dues deduction from teachers’ paychecks—both of which would be eliminated under Walker’s proposal.
Employers will be prohibited from collecting union dues and members of collective bargaining units will not be required to pay dues.
In essence, Walker’s proposal threatens the life blood of the WEAC which, according to its most recent financial report on file (FY 2009), raked in over $25 million from teachers in a one year period.
Another threat to WEAC, which no one in the mainstream media is talking about is the threat to the union’s insurance trust, called WEA Trust. The WEA Trust is, in essence, a union-run “multi-employer” health insurance trust (the employers, in this case, are school districts).
The way it works is that WEAC has, through collective bargaining (negotiations), convinced school districts to pay into the WEA Trust and, in turn, the WEA Trust is responsible for administering teachers’ benefits. According to PublicSchoolSpending.com, Walker’s proposal would give school boards the ability to shop freely for more competitive insurance rates and save the state millions.
Last year, the Education Action Group issued a report which stated, among other things, that:
WEA Trust, an insurance company established and closely associated with the Wisconsin Education Association Council (WEAC), siphons millions of crucial dollars from K-12 schools and their students every year.
WEA Trust has grown very fat on public school dollars, with a net worth of $316 million and a team of 12 administrators all receiving compensation packages worth six figures per year.
Sadly, this insurance swindle is endorsed by state law.
The group’s Communications Director, Steve Gunn, explains:
The pressure derives from state law, which makes the identity of a school’s health insurance carrier a topic of collective bargaining between local unions and school boards. That allows union representatives to come to the table demanding expensive WEA Trust coverage, and frequently school boards give in.
[snip]
Once school districts sign up for WEA Trust coverage, and write the carrier into collective bargaining agreements, the shackles are on. And they aren’t easily removed.
Local unions often refuse to have the provision stricken from school labor contracts in subsequent negotiations. If a school board presses the issue in an effort to save money, WEAC will frequently take the case to arbitration.
The Trust’s business practices also complicate the problem.
Districts need employee claim histories to provide to potential bidders, but WEA Trust sometimes refuses to surrender the information, making it more difficult, if not impossible, for competitors to draft an accurate insurance estimate.
WEA Trust also reportedly threatens districts with higher premiums – by removing them from regional insurance pools with lower rates – if they consider a cheaper carrier.
Some districts have managed to break WEA Trust’s shackles and the savings tell the story. Officials from 15 districts recently told EAG that they saved six figures the first year under new coverage, while still providing quality health benefits for employees. They also say the cost of their new coverage has remained steady in subsequent years.
But there is a catch. Officials at all of the breakaway districts said they had to surrender, or at least share, the insurance savings with their local unions, generally in the form of salary increases. That left them with little or no extra revenue to cover other costs.
In other words, WEAC, the union that has been most vocal during the last week’s protests has a vested interest in maintaining the status quo. If the union can defeat Scott Walker’s reform plans, not only does it keep the union dues of teachers, it also gets to keep its health insurance monopoly intact.
Of course, you’re not hearing this in the press as it doesn’t fit the convenient narrative of class warfare. So, the next time you have someone tell you how “mean” Scott Walker is for attacking the teachers’ union, you can simply reply: Follow the money.
_________________
“I bring reason to your ears, and, in language as plain as ABC, hold up truth to your eyes.” Thomas Paine, December 23, 1776
[Photo credit: Vaxomatic]
X-posted.
BenchCraft, LLC announced that it can debut its Concert Sequence, a fresh line of recliners with an integrated sound model, at Higher Position Market on October 17-22, 2009. Concert Series recliners attribute two built-in stereo speakers and a subwoofer engineered exclusively to produce a total range of sound. It's got tactile motors that may possibly vibrate together with the sound or be used independently being a massage process, and separate controls that allow for particular person changes to become produced to your volume, bass/treble, and also tactile/massage aspect. The product, which will have a very starting up selling price position of $699, may also incorporate a mini audio jack so end users can connect to their various audio resources (i.e. iPods, MP3 gamers, cell phones, and so on.). To that stop, Sinning noted that Berkline will even be introducing in select movement
bench craft company reviews
furniture its new eCoupled engineering option--a wireless charging station for electronic products such as cell phones, MP3 gamers, and laptops. Produced by Fulton Innovation, it eliminates the have to have for electrical power cords by producing an electromagnetic conduit mixed with an intelligent manage product that constantly monitors electrical power movement so many different products from completely different manufactures can cost simultaneously. eCoupled technological know-how can be risk-free for digital products due to the fact it allows for only the amount of energy
bench craft company reviews
wanted to help keep a device at peak vitality levels, so there is certainly no threat of overcharging. Even though the volume of products compatible with this particular know-how is constrained, Berkline expects that further and much more makes will move toward incorporating the capability to connect towards the eCoupled perform
The Bench Craft Company gives no excuses for your hard do the trick and perseverance that they commit themselves to so as to manage themselves as the leader in nationwide onsite golf course home
bench craft company reviews
advertising. No excuses for furnishing their clients together with the most comprehensive protection for their bench craft company reviews marketing dollar no matter if it be locally or nationwide. No excuses for offering golf program properties essentially the most seamless program for creating added revenue during the most non-intrusive manner, although enhancing the superior for the services in addition to the practical knowledge of their golfers on their house. Bench Craft is committed to becoming the top along with the most significant at what they do, advertising on golf course bench craft company reviews venues.
In an age where by nobody
bench craft company reviews
desires to take responsibility for anything, Bench Craft would make by itself absolutely responsible for the accomplishment of their marketing consumers, which is why their clientele and nicely as Bench Craft continuously practical knowledge nutritious development charges and revenue margins. A service are not able to be anymore
bench craft company reviews
prosperous than their purchaser, so it truly is goal of Bench Craft to produce particular that every last client gets the most suitable doable venue for presenting their clientele
bench craft company reviews
goods and providers, regardless if it be locally or nationally. This dedication to excellent is what sets Bench Craft aside from its opponents, and dollar for dollar helps make its advertising products several of the most treasured from the business.
The golf courses bench craft company reviews that Bench Craft Company will work in concert with, acquire services and products at no amount. Bench Craft Company gross sales team immediately funds this strategy for each golf program by obtaining sponsors for every product or service. Neighborhood vendors and players with the neighborhood obtain sponsorship priority and golf course management will work closely with Bench Craft to understand likely sponsors. Bench Craft’s hugely productive
bench craft company reviews
procedure features golf courses a 100 % free of cost alternative that also eliminates expenditures as a result of style and design modifications, program modifications, theft and vandalism.
As currently being a definite extra advantage, every single program is safeguarded underneath a $3,000,000 liability policy. The organization can accommodate pretty much each golf course. Moreover, Bench Craft Company works together with all branches from the Armed Forces, plus state, county and town golf courses. This range of golf courses allows for Bench Craft’s consumers using the most comprehensive coverage of golf program properties with the United states.
The forward
bench craft company reviews
pondering Visionaries at Bench Craft Company designed a approach that garners the focus and participation of not simply its very own income staff, but the sponsors, golf program management and then the membership and patrons. There’s only one Bench Craft Company, do not drop for rip off plots by imposters working a scam.
bench craft company reviews
No comments:
Post a Comment